Decision Rules for the Academy Awards Versus Those for Elections
نویسندگان
چکیده
Many researchers have evaluated various decision rules to determine how well they perform in selecting winners in elections. They have established criteria to measure how well these rules perform in selecting winners with the greatest mass appeal in general elections. We evaluate such decision rules on their performance in determining winners of awards for outstanding accomplishment. We examined the procedures the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences uses to choose nominees and winners for Academy Awards. We chose this example for two reasons. First, the academy uses several decision rules to select nominees and to select the winners from the lists of final nominees. Second, Academy Awards have an enormous impact on earnings and careers. We found that decision rules that can have negative effects in elections based on mass appeal can have positive aspects in determining winners of awards for outstanding accomplishment.
منابع مشابه
ماهیت مدیریت جریان داوری توسط مراکز داوری و قانون حاکم بر آن
Abstract With increasing tendency in international commercial arbitration, the role of arbitration institutes and centers is highly considered in arbitral affairs. These centers consider various applications for themselves within the framework of rules and regulations ranging from “offering office services” to “arbitration process management”. With arbitration process management, the arbitra...
متن کاملApplication of Compatibility Provision and More Favourable Right Provisions in New York Convention: A Modern View
More favorable law Right Provision and compability provision are contemplated in New York convention. When a country implement New York Convention, the arisen question is that if someone can invoke more favorable provisions of both convention and domestic laws for enforcement and recognition of an arbitral award. To deal with this question conventional award and in particular non-domestic ones ...
متن کاملReflection on Foreign Arbitratral Award from the Perspective of United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York 1958)
The Convention of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral, New York 1958, is a comprehensive instrument which facilitates the enforcement of decisions of arbitration body. In accordance to Article 1, the convention can be applied on a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, or can be applied to arbitral awards not considered as domesti...
متن کاملThe Challenges of the Elections Systems of Persian Gulf Arab Countries
This article intends to clarify views regarding important challenges that have originated from the political, social, cultural and geopolitical structures in the elections systems of Persian Gulf Arab countries. Challenges that determine the compatibility levels of elections systems of these countries with the world’s democratic systems. An efficient elections system is the prerequisite for the...
متن کاملSelf-enforcing Democracy
Democracy endures only if it self-enforcing. It is not a contract because there are no third parties to enforce it. To survive, democracy must be an equilibrium at least for those political forces which can overthrow it: given that others respect democracy, each must prefer it over the feasible alternatives. Without getting mired in de...nitional discussions, here is how democracy works: (for a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Interfaces
دوره 34 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004